Remember our article from last week? Where we told you about MaRBLe student Guna Schwanen and her chance to participate in the Student Research Conference (SRC)? Today we can announce that Guna has won the first prize in her category! Guna participated in the category ‘Law, Economy and Society’ and her research examined whether a relationship existed between self-compassion and social anxiety. After we congratulated her with her achievements, we of course asked her about her experiences during the conference. Read Guna’s answers below.
How did you experience the conference?
I had never been to a conference before, so it was quite a new and particular experience. The conference was arranged very well and the speeches of the academics were very interesting. I met a lot of new people and shared experiences with others. In general, I had a really good time. Although I thought I would be very nervous prior to my presentation, I was just a little tense and I really enjoyed telling people about my bachelor thesis.
What place did you get in the rankings, and how did this make you feel?
A total of 197 articles were submitted. Of these, 159 were reviewed by a review committee. Then 70 articles were selected: 33 students were chosen to give a workshop presentation and 37 students were chosen to give a poster presentation. The students that gave a workshop presentation could win one of the three awards within their domain. There were four domains, “Language & Culture”, “Exact”, “Law, Economy and Society” and “Medical & Health” and each of the domains had three prizes. Within my category “Law, Economy and Society”, nine students in total had to give a workshop presentation and three out of these nine students could win one of the three prizes. It turned out that I won the first price in my category!
I didn’t go to the conference with the idea or aim of winning any prizes. I just wanted to share my enthusiasm with the audience about the subject of my bachelor thesis and I hoped I could give people more insight in why having more self-compassion could be useful for anyone and give them some food for thought. Of course, when announced that I won the first price I was overjoyed and also speechless. I have worked hard to reach where I am today. So it was sort of a reward for my perseverance.
Did you get useful feedback on your presentation? And what did you learn from this conference?
We actually didn’t get any specific feedback on our presentation, but afterwards some people approached me and their reactions were very positive. What I learned from the MaRBLe program and the conference was how important it is that you are able to present your research in a convincing and understandable way. You ‘simply’ have to tell the audience what your research is about and how you executed it. The layman should be able to understand almost everything you present in my opinion. As a presenter I also find it is really important to be close to who I am and present as if I am telling a story to someone.
Did this experience/research track inspire you to pursue a career in research?
Yes, definitely. I am certainly considering to apply for a PhD in the future. I really would like to pursue a career not only in research, but also in teaching and partly as a trainer or psychologist. A combination of the three would be my ideal job.
Would you participate in such a conference/MaRBLe program again?
Yes, I definitely would participate again. Both were great experiences which I wouldn’t want to have missed.
We would like to congratulate Guna on her success at the SRC, and we wish her the best of luck with her career in research. On top of that we want to thank her for her cooperation and we hope that with her help we have been able to give some insights in how Maastricht University introduces its students to research and what students learn during an honours program like MaRBLe.
Would you like to read last week’s article and learn more about Guna her research? click here.
Or read Guna’s winning research paper in the SRC e-journal.
Stage 3: Align means and ends
At the Maastricht Sustainability Institute, teaching and learning in the master takes place in a ‘flipped classroom’ format. Small groups of 5 to 6 students first work independently on learning objectives, and subsequently report back in a plenary meeting with around 20 students. This puts a strong emphasis on the self-directed and collaborative aspects of learning. To prepare for this, at the beginning of the programme, students do an exercise in group work. They also draw up a Team Charter that describes how they will collaborate.
Stage 5: How are we doing?
This activity aims to get students to reflect on their experiences with PBL, especially those that have been less positive, thinking first about what caused the disappointment, then possible solutions. The activity involves a 10-15-minute individual reflection activity, followed by some 30 minutes of small group discussion of causes and solutions to problems. The tutor’s role (not described in the exercise) is to monitor the discussion and ensure suggestions are collected in a useable form.
Stage 4: Keeping up the spirit
At the MSc Learning and Development in Organisations, learning is based on the principles of constructive, contextual, collaborative and self-directed learning. The constructive and collaborative aspects of learning in particular, are seen as very similar to learning and working in a professional context. In the coaching that is an integral part of this programme, reflection on what is learned and how it is learned become two sides of the same coin. Goal setting and self-evaluation by students concerns the development of competencies and the way in which these are acquired through learning.
Stage 2: Mind the gap to previous experiences
We used a flipped format to deliver PBL information during Introduction days. We set up a canvas course dedicated to Introduction days were students could find all sort of information, including websites, contact information and student manuals related to their selected study programme. Within this canvas site, we added an Introduction days schedule with embedded welcome videos and/or documents. In the week prior to Introduction Days, participants received an email (via Canvas announcements) asking them to go over the event’s schedule on Canvas and watch a ~40 min video with a detailed explanation on how PBL works. During Introduction days the panel was organized as follows:
— Panel chair briefly summarized the main concepts related to PBL
— The tutors/coordinators and current students panelists introduced themselves and shared (informally) their thoughts and experience with PBL
— The chair opened the room for questions from new students
Unlike previous years that used a simple PBL presentation (passive listening), the flipped approach allowed us to provide the factual information before hand and opt for a more active PBM meeting for optimal engagement of participants during the event. Participants asked many questions, often building up from answers provided by the panel. Having a diverse panel answering questions was an added bonus, as the participants quickly realized that different coordinators/tutors might approach PBL differently, depending on the content and focus of the course. The current student perspective was very valuable as they provided examples of how they prepare for PBL and act as chairs or scribes. In Period 2 we asked the new students to provide feedback about Introduction Days and they commented quite favorably about the active PBL panel.
Stage 1: Mapping Teaching & Learning Styles
This activity is designed to get students to compare their expectations of teacher and student roles, with the hope of revealing underlying cultural perceptions so that all are aware of them and they can be addressed. When grouping the students, try to select diverse nationality groups. Time stage A so that students discuss their (national) cultural expectations before learning in detail about PBL. Carry out stage B after they have received some input about what PBL is.